What surprised me about the Russian meteor news last week is that scientists and the public knew plenty about the large asteroid that missed Earth by 17,000 miles but nothing about the 7,000-ton meteor coming right at us the same day at the unimaginable speed of 40,000 miles per hour (really, try to imagine 40,000 mph).
The New York Times reported one scientist saying that the meteor was impossible to see with a telescope because it had approached from the daylight side. But this meteor had previously been circling the sun in its own orbit—an asteroid—and its path could, it seems to me, have been anticipated. Later news, of course, was filled with plans for renewed efforts to spot such intruders in the future.
The larger message, though, is that when it comes to dangerous disruptions in our environment, scientists and people in general are often looking in the wrong direction. We head off one obvious consequence but miss the long-term effects of a slower moving one. One problem makes headlines, solutions gain momentum, but a related problem grows in the shadows.
For example, we value agriculture and industrialization so much that we pay little or no attention to the species that have become reduced or extinct from the loss of their habitats. We’ve expected global warming to raise temperatures slightly; we did not expect it to contribute to more violent storms. The 2004 tsunami in Indonesia killed 230,000 people; there were plenty of tsunami detectors in the Pacific Ocean where tsunamis are frequent but none in the Indian Ocean where they are rare. Disease control teams respond quickly to dangerous viruses, but a few people get on airplanes and the damage is difficult to control.
Our lapses in anticipating disasters, both man-made and natural, aren’t surprising. We are fallible. And when when our fallibility joins together with the sheer power of nature to clobber us, the result is humbling. It’s unlikely that an apocalypse will wipe us all out any time soon; we are, after all, a global species. But we may well be driven into decline by combinations of our mistakes and nature’s realities: earthquakes, limited fresh water, the loss of habitable places, the dysfunctions of our cultures, surges in population.
Echoing the thoughts of many people, a church deacon in Russia who saw the light from the meteor told a Times reporters, “It was like a new sun was born. This all gives us reason to think. Is the purpose of our life just to raise a family and die, or is it to live eternally? It was a reason for people on earth to look up, to look up at God.”
I agree with the Deacon that the event gives us good reason to think and to look up. What it prompts me to think about is that our purposes of raising a family, helping others to a good life, grasping the smallness of our selves while remaining confident about the durability of life, are all valuable and fragile. And we should keep an eye on our blind spots.